Supporters of the ban argue that TikTok poses a significant national security threat due to its ownership by the Chinese company ByteDance. They emphasize the potential for Chinese government interference and access to the personal data of U.S. users, which could be used for espionage or information manipulation. This perspective frames the ban as a necessary step to protect U.S. citizens and infrastructure from foreign adversaries.

Critics contend that the ban violates the First Amendment rights of TikTok's 170 million U.S. users, as well as the company's economic rights. They argue that the legislation and court ruling represent an overreach by the government, undermining free expression and innovation in the tech sector. This perspective highlights concerns about setting a precedent for government censorship and targeting specific companies without concrete evidence of wrongdoing.

Some interpret the ban as a strategic maneuver in the broader context of U.S.-China relations, aiming to curb China's influence in global technology markets. They see the divestiture requirement as part of a competitive strategy to boost U.S.-based companies and regain control over data governance. This perspective underscores the geopolitical stakes and economic motivations behind the legislative actions, framing the issue as part of a larger power struggle between the two nations.