Supporters of President Yoon Suk Yeol view the attempted detainment as a politically motivated act by opposition forces aiming to undermine democracy. They believe Yoon's declaration of martial law was necessary to counteract 'anti-state forces' and maintain national stability. The presence of thousands of protesters, waving South Korean and American flags, underscores their belief that the opposition's actions threaten the nation's democratic fabric and sovereignty.

Critics of Yoon argue that the declaration of martial law was an abuse of power, reflecting authoritarian tendencies incompatible with a democratic system. They assert that the attempted detainment is a necessary step to uphold the rule of law and hold leaders accountable. The opposition highlights Yoon's defiance of legal summons and his use of security forces to obstruct judicial processes as evidence of his disregard for democratic principles.

Observers view the standoff as emblematic of a broader institutional crisis, where the interplay between executive authority and judicial independence has reached a critical impasse. The event reflects deep political polarization, with both sides entrenched in conflicting narratives. This paralysis, compounded by mass protests and an uncertain impeachment outcome, risks destabilizing South Korea's governance and undermining its international reputation.